Å gå tilbake til slike varianter er besnærende, men likevel et brudd med forskriften om kontinuitet. Konsekvensen vil være antikvarianisme og således like galt som Novus Ordo-opphavsmennenes (Concilium og Bugnini) påståtte tilbakevenden til den “opphavelige” liturgi.

The anglican bishops and prests are not true bishops and priests. They are just laymen as their ordinations have been declared “void and null” by the Pope Leo XIII in his encyclical Apostolicae Curae, September 18, 1896, on the nullity of Anglican Orders :
“we pronounce and declare that ordinations carried out according to the Anglican rite have been, and are, absolutely null and utterly void.”
So the mass they performed even if it looks traditionnal is totally invalid. They just worship bread and wine.
If you want to know more about it, I suggest that you read the book of Michael Davies about the anglicanism : “Cranmer’s Godly Order: The Destruction of Catholicism Through Liturgical Change”.
You have to know about some few names like Ambrose de Lisle, Newman, the pastor Pusey, Lord Halifax, Father Portal, Dom Beauduin, ...

NS : Sorry for wiriting in english… My norwegian isn’t that good when it comes to write about religion.

Hva tar du under tvil ?

Don’t you believe the pope Leo XIII ? Do you think he was wrong in his encyclical Apostolicae Curae ?
(You can read this encyclical here : http://www.papalencyclicals.net/Leo13/l13curae.htm )

Here is the end of the Pope’s encyclical :

40. We decree that these letters and all things contained therein shall not be liable at any time to be impugned or objected to by reason of fault or any other defect whatsoever of subreption or obreption of our intention, but are and shall be always valid and in force and shall be inviolably observed both juridically and otherwise, by all of whatsoever degree and preeminence, declaring null and void anything which, in these matters, may happen to be contrariwise attempted, whether wittingly or unwittingly, by any person whatsoever, by whatsoever authority or pretext, all things to the contrary notwithstanding.

41. We will that there shall be given to copies of these letters, even printed, provided that they be signed by a notary and sealed by a person constituted in ecclesiastical dignity, the same credence that would be given to the expression of our will by the showing of these presents.

Given at Rome, at St. Peter’s, in the year of the Incarnation of Our Lord, one thousand eight hundred and ninety-six, on the Ides of September, in the nineteenth year of our pontificate.
—Leo PP. XIII
——————————————————
Here come also another document written by the english catholic bishops at that time. The title of this document is “A VINDICATION OF THE BULL ’APOSTOLICÆ CURÆ’. A LETTER ON ANGLICAN ORDERS, BY THE CARDINAL ARCHBISHOP AND BISHOPS OF THE PROVINCE OF WESTMINSTER IN REPLY TO THE LETTER ADDRESSED TO THEM BY THE ANGLICAN ARCHBISHOPS OF CANTERBURY AND YORK - 1898”

You can download this document here :
http://www.rore-sanctifica.org/etudes/2006/RORE-2006-02-17-EN-Vindication_of_Apostolicae_Curae_1898.pdf

Do you know better the question of the invalidity of the ordination in the anglican Church than the Pope Leo XIII and the catholic bishops and cardinals from England ?

Do you oppose the pope on that matter ?

So if you don’t (and you should) therefore you should logically come to the conclusion that the masses celebrated by the anglicans are invalid because the anglican “priests” are not priests.

These anglican “priests” don’t possess the power to transform the bread and the wine into the flesh and the blood of our Lord.

So, good norwegian catholics, don’t be fool of the anglican liturgy ! It looks nice, it smells nice, ..., but it’s totally invalid. It’s empty. The bread remains bread and the wine remains wine.

NB : It’s not a personnal attack against you, pastor Moi. I am just defending the catholic truth. As a catholic, that’s my duty.

Som jeg skrev over, er det ikke slik Den katolske kirke beskriver våre protestantiske brødre og søstre i vår tid – det kan du se i alle dokumenter som er skrevet de siste 40 år – selv om vi (som du sier) heller ikke kan anerkjenne deres kirkelige embeder.