{"id":9450,"date":"2015-01-17T16:04:00","date_gmt":"2015-01-17T14:04:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/aomoi.net\/blogg\/?p=9450"},"modified":"2015-01-21T20:40:56","modified_gmt":"2015-01-21T18:40:56","slug":"dokumentet-dominus-jesus-under-angrep","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/aomoi.net\/blogg\/2015\/01\/dokumentet-dominus-jesus-under-angrep\/","title":{"rendered":"Dokumentet «Dominus Jesus» under angrep?"},"content":{"rendered":"

Noks\u00e5 overraskende leste jeg hos Sandro Magister<\/a> at det kjente dokumentet Dominus Jesus fra \u00e5r 2000 (LES DET HER<\/a>), om Jesus som eneste vei til frelse, og et tillegg om hva som kreves for \u00e5 virkelig kunne kalles en Kirke. Jesuitten Jacques Dupuis kritiserer dokumentet i en bok som kom ute etter hans d\u00f8d, skriver Magister, og:<\/p>\n

The Bolognese historian (Professor Alberto Melloni) dismisses \u201cDominus Iesus\u201d as \u201cthe most fragile document of the Wojtylian pontificate,\u201d portrays it as \u201cnot accepted by Catholic theologians\u201d and attributes its composition – on a par with the notification that Dupuis was made to sign at that time – to the \u201cincompetence\u201d of unspecified \u201ccollaborators of the congregation,\u201d which Ratzinger \u201cin direct conversations demonstrated he did not value and did not know,\u201d and to which John Paul II \u201cdid not react,\u201d in spite of the fact that the \u201cmaneuver\u201d had as its \u201ctarget\u201d – again in Melloni\u2019s view – precisely \u201cthe papacy of Wojtyla and his peculiar fidelity to Vatican II, the prayer of Assisi on the on hand and the \u2018mea culpa\u2019 of the Jubilee, his ecumenical attitude, his ideas about the God of the Quran and about the permanence of Israel\u2019s covenant.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Men kardinal Ratzinger skriver selv om hvordan pave Johannes Paul tydelig st\u00f8ttet utgivelsen av dette dokumentet, og forstod hva det handlet om:<\/p>\n

In refutation of the timidity and indolence of Ratzinger and John Paul II, who according to Melloni permitted rather than intended the composition and publication of \u201cDominus Iesus,\u201d letting it be done by anyone whatsoever, there is no mistaking what the pope emeritus wrote a year ago in a book on pope Wojtyla:<\/p>\n

\u201cAmong the documents on various aspects of ecumenism, the one that prompted the greatest reaction was the declaration \u2018Dominus Iesus\u2019 of 2000, which summarizes the indispensable elements of the Catholic faith. […]<\/p>\n

\u201cIn the face of the firestorm that had developed around \u2018Dominus Iesus,\u2019 John Paul II told me that he intended to defend the document unequivocally at the Angelus. He invited me to write a text for the Angelus that would be, so to speak, airtight and not subject to any different interpretation whatsoever. It had to be completely unmistakable that he approved the document unconditionally.<\/p>\n

\u201cSo I prepared a brief address: I did not intend, however, to be too brusque, and so I tried to express myself clearly but without harshness. After reading it, the pope asked me once again: \u2018Is it really clear enough?\u2019 I replied that it was.<\/p>\n

\u201cThose who know theologians will not be surprised that in spite of this there were afterward some who maintained that the pope had prudently distanced himself from that text.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Noks\u00e5 overraskende leste jeg hos Sandro Magister at det kjente dokumentet Dominus Jesus fra \u00e5r 2000 (LES DET HER), om Jesus som eneste vei til frelse, og et tillegg om hva som kreves for \u00e5 virkelig kunne kalles en Kirke. Jesuitten Jacques Dupuis kritiserer dokumentet i en bok som kom ute etter hans d\u00f8d, skriver […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"site-sidebar-layout":"default","site-content-layout":"","ast-site-content-layout":"default","site-content-style":"default","site-sidebar-style":"default","ast-global-header-display":"","ast-banner-title-visibility":"","ast-main-header-display":"","ast-hfb-above-header-display":"","ast-hfb-below-header-display":"","ast-hfb-mobile-header-display":"","site-post-title":"","ast-breadcrumbs-content":"","ast-featured-img":"","footer-sml-layout":"","ast-disable-related-posts":"","theme-transparent-header-meta":"","adv-header-id-meta":"","stick-header-meta":"","header-above-stick-meta":"","header-main-stick-meta":"","header-below-stick-meta":"","astra-migrate-meta-layouts":"default","ast-page-background-enabled":"default","ast-page-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-5)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"ast-content-background-meta":{"desktop":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"tablet":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""},"mobile":{"background-color":"var(--ast-global-color-4)","background-image":"","background-repeat":"repeat","background-position":"center center","background-size":"auto","background-attachment":"scroll","background-type":"","background-media":"","overlay-type":"","overlay-color":"","overlay-opacity":"","overlay-gradient":""}},"footnotes":""},"categories":[3,6,15],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-9450","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-katolsk","category-paven","category-teologi"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/aomoi.net\/blogg\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9450","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/aomoi.net\/blogg\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/aomoi.net\/blogg\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/aomoi.net\/blogg\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/aomoi.net\/blogg\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9450"}],"version-history":[{"count":5,"href":"https:\/\/aomoi.net\/blogg\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9450\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":9455,"href":"https:\/\/aomoi.net\/blogg\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9450\/revisions\/9455"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/aomoi.net\/blogg\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9450"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/aomoi.net\/blogg\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9450"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/aomoi.net\/blogg\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9450"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}