Bispesynoden i Roma om «Guds ord» er ferdig med to av sine tre uker, og John Allen har kommet med en oppsummering om hva biskopene er blitt enige om så langt. Følgende ting, sier han, er blitt nevnt flere ganger og alle biskoper ser ut til å mene at dette er sentralt og viktig:
* The «Word of God,» in the Catholic understanding, is broader than the written texts of scripture. It refers principally to a person, Jesus Christ, so it is theologically inaccurate to describe Christianity (at least in its Catholic form) as a «religion of the book.»
* Scripture must be read in the context of the church, meaning its tradition, doctrinal teachings and worship. Among other things, this point implies a greater accent on the link between the Bible and the liturgy, especially the Mass.
* The Bible is not simply a piece of ancient literature, and therefore can’t be interpreted exclusively through the lens of history and literary criticism. Biblical interpretation has to press deeper, towards a «theological exegesis,» which relates specialized study of the Bible to the faith life of the church and the personal struggles of real people.
* The Bible is a natural bridge for better relations with other Christians and with Jews, since it represents a shared «common home,» despite obvious differences in interpretation.
* The church is obligated not merely to proclaim the Word of God, but also to listen to it. This is a special challenge, several speakers have pointed out, in a world where listening is often a lost art.
Several practical points were stressed so often that they’re also safe bets to be among the final propositions:
the need for better homilies; wider practice of Lectio Divina, meaning the use of the Bible in prayer; the need to make translations of the Bible available in all languages.
Say what? …»the Bible available in all (sic!) languages», not just Latin? :)
Jeg tok bort siste del av det avsnittet; det syntes å være unødvendig:
«… available in all languages, especially in isolated areas of the developing world where there’s no edition in the local language — or where the local language is still entirely oral.»