15. januar i år holdt biskop Athanasius Schneider er foredrag i Paris for en gruppe som heter Réunicatho (og som jeg ikke kjenner til). Han holdt et foredrag om liturgien, som kan deles inn i fem hovedpunkter. Jeg tar med hovedpunktene og noen utvalgte deler:
I – Turning our gaze towards Christ
II – The Mass is intended to give glory to God, not to men
III – The Six Principles of the Liturgical Reform
The Second Vatican Council put forward the following principles regarding a liturgical reform:
1. During the liturgical celebration, the human, the temporal, and action must be directed towards the divine, the eternal, and contemplation; the role of the former must be subordinated to the latter (Sacrosanctum Concilium, 2).
2. During the liturgical celebration, the realization that the earthly liturgy participates in the heavenly liturgy will have to be encouraged (Sacrosanctum Concilium, 8).
3. There must be absolutely no innovation, therefore no new creation of liturgical rites, especially in the rite of Mass, unless it is for a true and certain gain for the Church, and provided that all is done prudently and, if it is warranted, that new forms replace the existing ones organically (Sacrosanctum Concilium, 23).
4. The rites of Mass must be such that the sacred is more explicitly addressed (Sacrosanctum Concilium, 21).
5. Latin must be preserved in the liturgy, especially in Holy Mass (Sacrosanctum Concilium, 36 and 54).
6. Gregorian chant has pride of place in the liturgy (Sacrosanctum Concilium, 116).The Council Fathers saw their reform proposals as the continuation of the reform of Saint Pius X (Sacrosanctum Concilium 112 and 117) and of the servant of God Pius XII; indeed, in the liturgical constitution, Pius XII’s Encyclical Mediator Dei is what is most often cited.
Among other things, Pope Pius XII left the Church an important principle of doctrine regarding the Holy Liturgy, namely the condemnation of what is called liturgical archeologism. Its proposals largely overlapped with those of the Jansenistic and Protestant-leaning synod of Pistoia (see “Mediator Dei,” 63-64). As a matter of fact they bring to mind Martin Luther’s theological thinking. …
IV – The five wounds of the liturgical mystical body of Christ
Disse oppsummerer Father Z. slik:
1 Mass versus populum.
2 Communion in the hand.
3 The Novus Ordo Offertory prayers.
4 Disappearance of Latin in the Ordinary Form.
5 Liturgical services of lector and acolyte by women and ministers in lay clothing.
V –The Motu Proprio: putting an end to rupture in the liturgy
In the Motu Proprio Summorum Pontificum, Pope Benedict XVI stipulates that the two forms of the Roman rite are to be regarded and treated with the same respect, because the Church remains the same before and after the Council. In the letter accompanying the Motu Proprio, the pope wishes the two forms to enrich each other mutually. Furthermore he wishes that the new form “be able to demonstrate, more powerfully than has been the case hitherto, the sacrality which attracts many people to the former usage.” …
One of the necessary conditions for a fruitful new evangelization would be the witness of the entire Church in the public liturgical worship. It would have to observe at least these two aspects of Divine Worship:
1) Let the Holy Mass be celebrated the world over, even in the ordinary form, in an internal and therefore necessarily also external “conversio ad Dominum”.
2) Let the faithful bend the knee before Christ at the time of Holy Communion, as Saint Paul demands when he mentions the name and person of Christ (see Phil 2:10), and let them receive Him with the greatest love and the greatest respect possible, as befits Him as true God.Thank God, Benedict XVI has taken two concrete measures to begin the process of a return from the liturgical Avignon exile, to wit the Motu Proprio Summorum Pontificum and the reintroduction of the traditional Communion rite. …
Gitt at den hl. Far deler disse synspunkter synes det litt rart at man fortsetter å hevde at novus ordo-messen representerer et fremskritt og bare trenger noen få justeringer. Uansett hvor verdig den feires kan den jo ikke i samme grad som den tradisjonelle gjenspeile den katolske teologi, og vil ikke da all logikk tilsi at man velger den siste som Kirkens normative messefeiring? Naturligvis vil dette føre til et ramaskrik – men det er også en måte å vekke folk på….
Vel, Atle, biskop Schneiders fokus i dette foredraget er ikke i særlig stor grad på den tradisjonelle messen. Bare punktet om offertoriebønnene handler tydelig om det, alt det andre han argumenterer for kan gjennomføres i den nye messen.
Jeg er enig i at det er lite passende å presentere den nye messen utelukkende som et fremskritt, men den innførte noen få ting konsilet spesielt hadde bedt om – samtidig som den innførte mye uheldig, som konsilet ikke hadde nevnt med et ord.