Jeg leser, som jeg har nevnt tidligere, Michael Davies’ bok «Pope Paul’s New Mass», og på s 80 i boka siterer Davies den kjente sosiologen (jeg har lest om ham mange ganger hos Fr. Richard Neuhaus og i First Things), som uttaler seg om forandringene i den katolske messen som soiolog og lutheraner.
(Her må man være klar over at det er forandringene i radikal form han snakker om, slik det ble over alt i USA og mange andre lnad; latin helt borte, det gamle alteret borte, presten står ved et lite bord vendt mot menigheten, prekestol og statuer forsvunnet, musikken fullstendig modernisert etc.) Peter Berger er svært streng i sin vurdering av effekten av disse forandringene:
In May 1978, Peter A. Berger, a Lutheran professor of sociology, commented on the changes within the Catholic Church since Vatican II from the dispassionate standpoint of a professional sociologist:
«Thus there were extraordinary changes imposed on the Catholic community in areas where the authorities could have moved much more circumspectly. The liturgical revolution – no other term will do – is the most important case in point, touching millions of Catholics at the very core of their religious life. Let me only mention the sudden abolition and indeed prohibition of the Latin Mass, the transposition of the officiating priest from the front to the back of the altar (the first change symbolically diminished the universality of the Mass, the second, its transcendent reference) and the massive assault on a wide variety of forms of popular piety.»
Professor Berger insists that these changes were a mistake from the sociological point of view:
«If a thoroughly malicious sociologist, bent on injuring the Catholic community as much as possible, had been an adviser to the Church, he could hardly have done a better job.»