En amerikansk weblog undrer seg over hvordan aviser og nettsider over hele verden kan påstå de mest utrolige ting om Den katolske kirke. Nå i det siste dreier det seg om de «nye dødssyndene» og om pavens «rehabilitering» av Luther. Amy Welborn tror ikke det er vond vilje som gjør det (fordi de to siste rapportene var ikke spesielt ondsinnede, men «even an idiot reading this article could see that Girotti said nothing even close to what was reported. I can’t get inside the head of a writer who would say, “Okay … he’s said this … let’s put it in the context of … wait, I’ve got it … the 7 Deadly Sins! Let’s say he’s replacing them! With recycling!”
My powers of empathetic thinking have clearly reached their limit.
And the Luther business … where did that come from? Was someone toying with a reporter or what?