Katolsk

Gunnel Vallquist er død

Svenske Dagen melder tidligere i dag at Gunnel Vallquist er død, og skriver dette om henne:

Författaren och akademiledamoten Gunnel Vallquist har avlidit, vid en ålder av 97 år, uppger Svenska akademien i ett pressmeddelande. Hon har sedan 1982 varit en av de 18 ledamöter, som bland annat utser Nobelpristagaren i litteratur.

Gunnel Vallquist var en författare och översättare som var tydlig med sin kristna tro. Hon konverterade till katolicismen, och rapporterade bland annat från Andra vatikankonciliet, det stora katolska kyrkomötet på 1960-talet som omformade kyrkans historia.

Hon har också varit ledamot av den svenska Bibelkommissionen, mellan 1973-1980, och 1976 blev hon Teologie hedersdoktor vid Lunds universitet.

När Svenska akademien i ett pressmeddelande berättar om dödsfallet lyfter de också fram hennes kristna tro, och vilket betydelse den haft för hennes författarskap.

«Gunnel Vallquist hade en stark och respekterad ställning inom den katolska kyrkan. Mycket av hennes författarskap präglas också av hennes personliga tro», skriver de.

Den svenske katolske biskopen, Anders Arborelius, skriver også slik om henne:

«Gunnel Vallquist var en välkänd röst för katolska kyrkan i flera svenska akademiska sammanhang. Efter att ha följt det Andra Vatikankonciliet på plats i Rom lyckades hon visa mycket av den katolska kyrkans utveckling i modern tid, och hon fick många att öppna ögonen för katolsk tradition och teologisk förnyelse.

Hon hade en särskild personlig kärlek till fransk spiritualitet och litteratur, och gjorde det katolska Frankrike mer känt i Sverige. Hon hade också en stor förkärlek för att debattera och var mycket engagerad i teologiska samtal, i synnerhet om kyrkans enhet. Må hon vila i frid.»

Filius meus hic est, in quo bene complacui. Ipsum audite.

jesu_daap

«Hodie caelesti sponso iuncta est Ecclesia, quoniam in Iordane lavit eius crimina.
Currunt cum munere Magi ad regales nuptias et ex aqua facto vino laetantur convivia.
Baptizat miles Regem, servus Dominum suum, Joannes Salvatorem.
Aqua Iordanis stupuit, columba protestatur. Paterna vox audita est:
Filius meus hic est, in quo bene complacui. Ipsum audite«.

“Today the Church is joined to the heavenly bridegroom, because he has washed her sins away in the Jordan. The Magi hasten to the royal wedding with gifts and the guests are gladdened with the water turned to wine. The soldier baptizes the King, the servant his Lord, John the Savior. The water of the Jordan is amazed, the dove bears witness. The voice of the Father is heard: This is my Son, with whom I am well pleased. Listen to him.”

Sandro Magister presenterer denne teksten fra den ambrosianske liturgien i starten av et innlegg der han presenterer:

… all fifteen of the baptismal homilies delivered by Joseph Ratzinger in the six years of his pontificate, at the Easter Vigil and on the Sunday of the Baptism of Jesus.

They are “mystagogical” homilies, of initiation into the mystery of baptism. Like those of Saint Cyril of Jerusalem, of Saint Ambrose of Milan, of other Fathers of the Church.

It is an anthology collected for the first time here, of extraordinary richness. As can be perceived from the passages of each homily as they gradually unfold.

Pave Benedikts prekener er fra påskenatt 2006-2012 og fra festen for Jesu dåp 2006-2013. Her er et utdrag fra påskenatt 2012:

… Through the sacrament of baptism and the profession of faith, the Lord has built a bridge across to us, through which the new day reaches us. The Lord says to the newly-baptized: Fiat lux – let there be light. God’s new day – the day of indestructible life, comes also to us. Christ takes you by the hand. From now on you are held by him and walk with him into the light, into real life. For this reason the early Church called baptism «photismos» – illumination.

Why was this? The darkness that poses a real threat to mankind, after all, is the fact that he can see and investigate tangible material things, but cannot see where the world is going or whence it comes, where our own life is going, what is good and what is evil. The darkness enshrouding God and obscuring values is the real threat to our existence and to the world in general. …

Katolsk liturgi i middelalderen – II

monty_sense_of_sacred_l
Jeg har nå lest gjennom mesteparten av boka A Sense of the Sacred: Roman Catholic Worship in the Middle Ages, av James Monti. Den har vært ganske interessant, men jeg har ikke lest alle delene av den like grundig. Boka trekker fram liturgier fra store deler av Europa; Spania, England, Roma, og også land som Polen, Litauen og Finland – stort sett liturgier fra 13-, 14- og 15-hundretallet. Første del av boka tar for seg de sju sakramantene, neste del viktige dager i kirkeåret, og tredje del andre viktige liturgier, som pavevalg og -innsettelse, helgenkåring o.a.

Hvis man kjenner den tradisjonelle liturgien (fra 1962), som jeg gjør f.eks.når det gjelder selve messen og også dåpsliturgien, gir ikke denne boka så mye ny informasjon, men den viser en del små varianter fra land til land – fra tida før den katolske liturgien ble mer strømlinjeforma etter konsilet i Trent. Hvis man derimot ikke kjenner den tradisjonelle liturgien, vil det meste av materialet som presenteres her være ganske nytt og spennende.

Gratulerer p. Erik Andreas Holth!

p_holth

I et brev fra troskongregasjonen datert 1. desember i år står det at at Erik Andreas Heyerdahl Holths prestevielse i Polish National Catholic Church er gyldig, og at han dispenseres fra forpliktelsen til sølibat. Paven gir samtidig biskop Bernt Eidsvig fullmakt til å inkardinere p. Holth i Oslo katolske bispedømme og gi ham et pastoralt oppdrag.

Han vil inkardineres og settes inn i tjenesten allerede 7. februar i St. Paul menighet i Bergen, som han har tilhørt siden han ble opptatt i Den katolske kirkes fulle fellesskap i 2012.

Polish National Catholic Church er «Moderkirke» for Den nordisk katolske kirke, hvor p. Holth gjorde tjeneste som prest i ti år, fra 2001 til 2011. Før det virket han syv år som prest i Den norske kirke. De senere år har han gjort frivillig innsats som kateket og leder for ekteskapskurs i St. Paul, og han har også vært nestleder for menighetsrådet.

Erik Andreas Holth er gift og har tre barn. Han blir Oslo katolske bispedømmes fjerde gifte prest.

Denne informasjonen er tatt fra katolsk.no, og det er gledelig at p. Holths ventetid nå er over. Så langt jeg vet er det ikke helt klart hva hans tjeneste skal bestå i, for det er ikke til å stikke under en stol at enkelte praktiske ting skaper problemer for oss gifte prester. P. Holth må nok fortsette sin jobb i videregående skole i (nesten) full stilling av økonomiske grunner, og vil bare kunne være prest på deltid. Av de to gifte mennene som ble ordinert i 2014 er den ene prest ved siden av full stilling, og den andre er pensjonist og jobber 50% i en menighet.

Selv ble jeg ordinert i januar 2000, og jobbet de første 6 årene 60% på St Skole i Bergen og 40% i menigheten. De siste nesten 10 årene har jeg vært prest på fulltid, men heller ikke det har vært uten problemer, for jeg kan ikke få noen ledende stilling (som f.eks. sogneadministrator) siden jeg er gift, og det ble ikke noen ordning på min avlønning før i mars 2014 – etter nokså lange og vanskelige forhandlinger.

Katolsk liturgi i middelalderen

monty_sense_of_sacred Jeg har startet på et ganske stort verk (650 s), om katolske liturgier (både messen og andre liturgier, dåp, konfirmasjon etc) i middelalderen: A Sense of the Sacred: Roman Catholic Worship in the Middle Ages, av James Monti.

Ignatius press presenterer boka slik:

This incomparable volume presents a comprehensive exploration and explanation of medieval liturgical celebrations. The reverent prayers, hymns and rubrics used in the Middle Ages are described in detail and interpreted through the commentary of scholars from the same time period, the era which is also known as the «Age of Faith».

Collected here is a wide range of ceremonies, encompassing the seven sacraments, the major feasts of the liturgical year (such as Christmas, Easter, and Corpus Christi), and special liturgical rites (from the coronation of the pope to the blessing of expectant mothers). The sacred celebrations have been drawn from countries across western and central Europe-from Portugal to Poland-but particular attention has been given to liturgical texts of medieval Spain, which until now have received relatively little attention from scholars.

Historian James Monti has done exhaustive research on medieval liturgical manuscripts, early printed missals, and the writings of medieval liturgists and theologians so that the treasures they contain can inspire a sense of the sacred in future generations of Catholics.

Et par anmeldere sier om boka:

«James Monti’s treatise is an astonishing achievement, a book that can and will shape a new generation of intellectuals who are serious about the Catholic liturgy. Despite the title, this book is not only about medieval liturgy. It’s about inspiring the creation of, and the provision of access to, truly sacred spaces in our time, even in a world that seems so barren of them. My own special interest is in Gregorian chant, but Monti’s book helps broaden the picture to include a spiritual panorama of extraordinary breadth and depth. We have so much to learn from the past and so much to work toward for a bright and beautiful future of recaptured truth.»

«Among the ambiguous legacy of the Liturgical Movement of the twentieth century is the neglect and incomprehension of medieval liturgy. This book is a welcome contribution towards redressing this imbalance. James Monti recovers the tradition of mystical commentary on the sacred rites, a common heritage of East and West, and enriches it with his vast historical erudition. This volume will serve as a useful resource for anyone who wishes to enter into the spirit of the liturgy that shaped a millennium of Christian history.»

To bøker av Uwe Michael Lang

lang_voice_of_church De to bøkene jeg nettopp har lest av Lang er The Voice of the Church at Prayer: Reflections on Liturgy and Language og Signs of the Holy One: Liturgy, Ritual, and Expression of the Sacred. To gode bøker, men det er nokså korte (og for det meste enkle), så det var ikke så mye ny informasjon for meg i dem.

Den første boka beskrives slik hos ignatius.com:

Pope Benedict XVI has made the liturgy a central theme of his pontificate, and he has paid special attention to the vitally important role of language in prayer. This historical and theological study of the changing role of Latin in the Roman Catholic Church sheds light on some of the Holy Father’s concerns and some of his recent decisions about the liturgy.

The Fathers of the Second Vatican Council allowed for extended use of the vernacular at Mass, but they maintained that Latin deserved pride of place in the Roman Rite. The outcome, however, was that modern translations of the prayers of the Mass replaced the Latin prayers.

What was the reason for the Council’s decision and why is there now a desire for greater use of Latin in Catholic worship? Why have some post-conciliar English translations of the prayers of the Mass been replaced?

Fr. Lang answers these questions by first analyzing the nature of sacred language. He then traces the beginnings of Christian prayer to the Scriptures and the Greek spoken at the time of the apostles. Next he recounts the slow and gradual development of Latin into the sacred language of the Western Church and its continuing use throughout the Middle Ages. Finally, he addresses the rise of modern languages and the ongoing question of whether the participation of the laity at Mass is either helped or hindered by the use of Latin.

lang_signs_of_holy

Den andre boka er beskrevet slik:

Catholic liturgy is far more than its texts. It is a synthesis that also includes several other elements—gesture, music, art, and architecture—which are aspects of the non-verbal language of the sacred and are what make the liturgy beautiful.

Father Lang’s consideration of the beauty of the liturgy addresses the modern notion that beauty is in the eye of the beholder, that the experience of beauty is entirely subjective. This idea makes it difficult to articulate criteria for what is beautiful, yet sacred liturgy does indeed have objective measures for evaluating its principal elements. Reflecting upon these and quoting from authoritative Church documents, Father Lang discusses sacred music, art, and architecture, and demonstrates how the beauty of these elements makes present the sacred.

Pope Benedict XVI said, “The greatness of the liturgy depends—we shall have to repeat this frequently—on its non-spontaneity.” Continuous liturgical experimentation is unable to induce a sense of meaning or peace, writes Father Lang, because novelty does not satisfy the yearning for the Transcendent within the human psyche, which is rarely far from the surface.

En ny forståelse av Kristi offer og messens offer

daily_sacrifice Jeg har nå lest ferdig ei bok jeg må innrømme at jeg ikke likte noe særlig. Det er Sacrifice Unveiled, The True Meaning of Christian Sarifice, skrevet av Robert Daly, SJ. Boka ble utgitt i 2009 men forfatteren har visst arbeidet med offer-temaet siden 60-tallet, og visst oppdaget mye nytt via fenomenoligiske og mimetiske teorier, og en grunnleggende forståelse av at offeret (og eukaristien) er Trinitarisk (hva nå det skal bety). I praksis fører det til at det er lite igjen av katolske forståelse av Kristi offer, og av eukaristien.

Daly har også skrevet en kortere framstilling av det boka handler om, og derfra siterer jeg:

… Traditional Western atonement theory — at least in its extreme, but all-too common forms — ultimately reduces to something like the following caricature: (1) God’s honor is damaged by sin; (2) God demanded a bloody victim to pay for this sin; (3) God is assuaged by the victim; (4) the death of Jesus the victim functioned as a payoff that purchased salvation for us.

Such a theory is literally monstrous in some of its implications. For when it is absolutized or pushed to its “theo-logical” conclusions and made to replace the Incarnation as central Christian doctrine, it tends to veil from human view (from Protestants as well as from Catholics) the merciful and loving God of biblical revelation. Despite my books and articles on the subject, I had for many years no satisfactory answer to this problem.

That changed when, serendipitously forced to edit Ed Kilmartin’s last book, I discovered the trinitarian understanding of sacrifice to which I now turn. Authentic Christian, that is, Trinitarian Understanding of Sacrifice Constantly fine-tuning my own understanding of it, … First of all, Christian sacrifice is not some object that we manipulate; it is not primarily a ceremony or ritual; nor is it something that we “do” or “give up.” For it is, first and foremost, something deeply personal: a mutually self-giving event that takes place between persons. Actually it is the most profoundly personal and interpersonal act of which a human being is capable or in which a human being can participate.

It begins in a kind of first “moment,” not with us but with the self-offering of God the Father in the gift-sending of the Son. Christian sacrifice continues its “process of becoming” in a second “moment,” in the self-offering “response” of the Son, in his humanity and in the power of the Holy Spirit, to the Father and for us. Christian sacrifice continues its coming-to-be, and only then does it begin to become Christian sacrifice in our lives when we, in human actions that are empowered by the same Spirit that was in Jesus, begin to enter into that perfect, en-spirited, mutually self-giving, mutually self-communicating personal relationship that is the life of the Blessed Trinity. …..

Krise for konservative katolikker

Denne litt dramatiske overskrifta finner vi i siste nummer av First Things, som gjengir Ross Douthats (som skriver i New York Times) Erasmus Lecture, som han holdt i New York tidligere i høst.

Det er et ganske langt foredrag, og jeg tar bare med det jeg syntes var den mest interessante/klargjørende delen:

… Two things have been genuinely revelatory about the Francis era, however. The first is how weak the Catholic center remains, how quickly consensus falls apart, and how much space actually separates the center-left and center-right within the Church. Until recently I thought of myself as part of that center-right, and from that vantage point, it seemed like there was a great deal of room for Pope Francis to tack center-leftward without opening up major doctrinal debates—tackling divorce and remarriage by streamlining the annulment process and making it more available in poorer countries, stressing the social gospel a little more and the culture war a little less, appointing women to run Vatican dicasteries, even reopening debates over female deacons and married priests. On some of these fronts conservatives would have doubted, questioned, or opposed, but the debates wouldn’t have led so quickly to fears of heresy and schism.

But instead, as Francis has pushed into more divisive territory, what I had thought of as the Catholic center-left has not only welcomed that push but written and spoken in ways that suggest they want to push further still—toward understandings of the sacraments, ecclesiology, and moral theology that seem less center-left than simply “left,” the purest vintage of the year of our Lord 1968 or 1975. Which perhaps reveals that I’ve actually been further “right” all along, but either way suggests a hollowness at the Catholic center, a striking lack of common ground.

Then it’s also been revelatory how strong a liberal constituency still remains within the priesthood and the episcopate, the places where one would have thought thirty years of papal conservatism would have left their strongest impact. Which, to be clear, they did: Seminaries really have changed dramatically since the ’70s, there really is a John Paul II and Benedict generation of younger priests, and the hierarchy is markedly more conservative than it was in the later years of Paul VI. Moreover, I do not think that most of the cardinals voting for Jorge Bergoglio thought that they were voting to reopen the Communion-and-remarriage debate, let alone that their votes were any kind of deliberate rejection of the magisterium of the ­previous two popes.

But the fact remains that a college theoretically “stacked” by John Paul II and Benedict XVI ­elected as pope a candidate who had been championed, across two conclaves, by the most liberal cardinals in the Church. The fact remains that all of the bishops who have agitated for changing the Church’s ­doctrine—or, as they claim, the Church’s discipline—on marriage and the sacraments were appointed by the last two popes. And the fact remains that while the majority of bishops do seem loyal in principle to the magisterium of John Paul II, there has been no shortage of episcopal enthusiasm for an ­essentially ­Hegelian understanding of the development of ­doctrine. …

Les hele foredraget her.

Ad orientem III

Det tredje eksempelet fra artikkelen jeg allerede har vist til, er biskop Edward Slattery i Tulsa, Oklahoma, USA. Han sier at han nesten alltid når han feirer messe i sin domkirke (de siste fem år) har han feiret messen «vendt samme vei som folket». Vider kan vi lese:

Bishop Slattery sees Cardinal Sarah’s recent liturgical remarks as a continuation of what Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger taught, especially in The Spirit of the Liturgy, while serving as prefect of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith prior to his election as Pope Benedict XVI. This, in turn, is seen by Bishop Slattery as a continuation of what the Fathers of Vatican II taught: “It’s nothing new, really. It’s not only a decades-old tradition, but a centuries-old tradition of the Church that has solid theological and practical foundations.”

It is common sense to Bishop Slattery, who recalls simple rules of communication: “When I’m speaking to someone, I usually face that person. So when I’m giving a sermon, I face the people, because they are the ones I’m addressing. When I’m in prayer — especially offering Jesus to the Father at the altar — I’m addressing the Father, so it is no wonder that I should be facing him, rather than the people.”

Bishop Slattery believes authentic participation is not facilitated by the priest facing the people at these times, because then the priest becomes the central focus … “The priest is supposed to lead the people in Christ to the Father,” the bishop added, “yet when the priest faces the people, he becomes a locked — rather than an open — door. Instead of thinking about Christ going to the Father, the faithful are thinking about the personality of the priest.”

Ad orientem II

Kardinal Robert Sarah er prefekt for Liturgikongregasjonen i Vatikanet, og skrev i juni i år om alterets og prestens retning i kirkerommet. Vatikankonsilet sa ikke noe om at alteret skulle snus, og faktisk er bedre at presten ikke har en så dominerende rolle i messen at han står og sitter rett foran menigheten, og vender seg mot dem under hele messen. Slik omtales det han skriver:

… The topic drawing most attention in the article was the direction of liturgical prayer — specifically, how the priest and people should be facing the same way during many parts of the Mass.

While some see this as a return to a “pre-Vatican II” liturgy, Cardinal Sarah showed it is quite the opposite — that it is, in fact, consonant with conciliar teachings. …. The African cardinal explained that “it is in full conformity with the conciliar constitution — indeed, it is entirely fitting — for everyone, priest and congregation, to turn together to the east during the penitential rite, the singing of the Gloria, the orations and the Eucharistic Prayer, in order to express the desire to participate in the work of worship and redemption accomplished by Christ.”

Cardinal Sarah emphasized that the priest must become the “instrument that allows Christ to shine through.” In the pursuit of this goal, he references Pope Francis remarking that the celebrant is not the host of a show, nor should he be seeking affirmation from the congregation, as if the primary concern of worship were a dialogue between the priest and assembly.
On the contrary, Cardinal Sarah believes that in order to enter into the true conciliar spirit, self-effacement is necessary for the priest who leads public worship. This self-effacement is implicit in the rubrics of the Roman Missal, which presume the priest will not be facing the congregation through the entirety of the Mass.

Dette har jeg tatt fra samme artikkel som jeg nevnte i går.

Nye dokumenter fra OKB i medlemsregistersaken

På denne nettsiden (se nederst) har Oslo katolske bispedømme nettopp lagt ut tre nye dokumenter i medlemsregistersaken.

Les dem gjerne selv, det er disse dokumentene som ble skrevet og sendt fra advokatfirmaet Arntzen de Besche til Kulturdepartementet i midten av desember:

Rutiner for inn- og utmelding av trossamfunn – klargjøring av praksisdirekte lenke.

Supplerende bemerkninger og opplysningerdirekte lenke.

Supplerende bemerkninger og opplysninger (ettersendelse)direkte lenke.

Liturgiske studier – og ad orientem

Jeg reiser ganske snart til utlandet igjen, og vil fortsette å lese om liturgiens utvikling – mest fram til ca år 1600, men jeg ser også på enkelte nyere temaer. Ett av disse helt nye temaene er hvilken vei presten og alteret skal vende seg under under messen – eller mer presis under deler av messen, for presten bør jo vende seg jo mot menighetslemmene når han snakker til dem. Jeg ser nå litt på hvorfor den liturgiske bevegelsen etter hvert (kanskje rundt 1930) begynte å tenke på å «snu alterne», noe vel ingen hadde tenkt på på langt over 1000 år (og knapt nok før den tid).

Jeg kom over denne artikkelen som tar opp dette temaet. En prest i Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA, har i sin menighet flyttet alteret tilbake til den opprinnelige plassen, undervist menigheten om dette, og om dette kan vi lese i artikkelen:

This traditional direction of liturgical prayer, referred to as ad orientem (facing east), had been nearly ubiquitous before the Second Vatican Council, yet almost vanished after it. This left most Catholics feeling the Council called for the priest to face the congregation, yet this was just that — a feeling — rather than a correct perception. None of the 16 conciliar documents contains an endorsement, let alone a mention, of the practice of the priest facing the congregation (versus populum) during the prayers of the Mass.

When Father Gawronski points this out to parishioners, he finds them to be generally receptive to it. “Old St. Patrick’s” worshippers have found his ad orientem Masses to be coherent and meaningful expressions of prayer. Rather than thinking of Father Gawronski as “having his back to the people,” parishioners see his positioning as the Church intends, expressive of the unity of the priest and congregation in their quest for God.

Father Gawronski believes the whole point of ad orientem worship is to demonstrate that the entire community is on the same page by facing the same God in prayer. …

Tradisjonell latinsk messe i Oslo søndag 27. desember

Denne søndagen feires søndag i juleoktaven etter den tradisjonelle kalenderen, i St Hallvard kirkes kapell kl 08.00.

Søndagens inngangsvers ser slik ut: «Mens dyp taushet lå over alle ting og natten var rukket midtveis i sitt løp. kom ditt allmektige Ord, Herre, ned fra den himmelske kongsstol. Herren er Konge, han har kledd seg i herlighet; han har ikledd seg styrke, og omgjordet seg. »

Og julepresfasjon (som brukes i denne messen) ser slik ut:

I sannhet verdig og rett er det, riktig og gagnlig at vi alltid og overalt takker deg, hellige Herre, allmektige Fader, evige Gud. For ved det menneskevordne Ords mysterium er det nye lys av din klarhet strålt fram for vår sjels øyne, så vi, når vi synlig erkjenner Gud, ved ham blir dradd til å elske det usynlige. Og derfor synger vi med engler og erkeengler, med troner og herredømmer og med hele den himmelske hærskare din herlighets pris, idet vi uten stans istemmer:

LES ALLE SØNDAGENS TEKSTER HER.

Neste TLM blir 31. januar (5. søndag i mnd). Da feires søndag sexagesima. Se oversikten her.

Expergiscere, homo: quia pro te Deus factus est homo.

I dag er det 10 år siden pave Benedikt holdt sin berømte første juletale til den romerske kuriaen, der han aller mest sentralt definerte Kirkens liv, arbeid og utvikling som noe som skjer innenfor og i kontinuitet med Kirkens tradisjon, aldri som brudd med tradisjonen. Her er starten av talen, samt det han sier om forandring i kontinuitet med tradisjonen:

«Expergiscere, homo: quia pro te Deus factus est homo – Wake up, O man! For your sake God became man» (St Augustine, Sermo, 185). With the Christmas celebrations now at hand, I am opening my Meeting with you, dear collaborators of the Roman Curia, with St Augustine’s invitation to understand the true meaning of Christ’s Birth. ….

God became man for our sake: this is the message which, every year, from the silent grotto of Bethlehem spreads even to the most out-of-the-way corners of the earth. Christmas is a feast of light and peace, it is a day of inner wonder and joy that expands throughout the universe, because «God became man». From the humble grotto of Bethlehem, the eternal Son of God, who became a tiny Child, addresses each one of us: he calls us, invites us to be reborn in him so that, with him, we may live eternally in communion with the Most Holy Trinity.

Our hearts brimming with the joy that comes from this knowledge, let us think back to the events of the year that is coming to an end. ….

…… The last event of this year on which I wish to reflect here is the celebration of the conclusion of the Second Vatican Council 40 years ago. This memory prompts the question: What has been the result of the Council? Was it well received? What, in the acceptance of the Council, was good and what was inadequate or mistaken? What still remains to be done? No one can deny that in vast areas of the Church the implementation of the Council has been somewhat difficult. …

….. there is an interpretation that I would call “a hermeneutic of discontinuity and rupture”; it has frequently availed itself of the sympathies of the mass media, and also one trend of modern theology. On the other, there is the “hermeneutic of reform,” of renewal in the continuity of the one subject-Church which the Lord has given to us. She is a subject which increases in time and develops, yet always remaining the same, the one subject of the journeying People of God.

The hermeneutic of discontinuity risks ending in a split between the pre-conciliar Church and the post-conciliar Church. It asserts that the texts of the Council as such do not yet express the true spirit of the Council. It claims that they are the result of compromises in which, to reach unanimity, it was found necessary to keep and reconfirm many old things that are now pointless. However, the true spirit of the Council is not to be found in these compromises but instead in the impulses toward the new that are contained in the texts. …..

Her kan hele talen leses.

Pave Frans har ikke tenkt å redusere tempoet

Det skriver John Allen, og han åpner sin artikkel slik:

Let’s face it: In some ways, 2015 has been a rough year for Pope Francis.

Despite continuing to bask in wide popularity, the pope presided over a tumultuous Synod of Bishops in October that exposed deep internal fractures over issues such as divorce and homosexuality, and which began with a Vatican official doing a round of sensational media interviews in which he acknowledged being in a committed gay relationship.

He’s watched a burgeoning Vatican leaks scandal that’s led to three former insiders and two journalists facing criminal charges, and he’s seen his own press office forced to release details of the autopsy of a former papal diplomat accused of sexual abuse, who died in August, because of persistent rumors he may have been killed to avoid the embarrassment of a trial.

Recently there have been indications of resentment from some of the pontiff’s own aides, including publication in a German newsmagazine of a stinging letter to the pope from a former Vatican official accusing him of weakness on doctrine, “authoritarianism,” and “wrath” toward critics.

Francis also took five successful but extremely demanding foreign trips during the past year. He recently celebrated his 79th birthday, and is poised to spend much of the next 12 months presiding over a grueling calendar linked to his special jubilee Year of Mercy.

Some might naturally wonder if all that has worn Francis down, perhaps lessening his resolve about the direction and pace of his reform agenda. In response, the pontiff on Monday effectively delivered a very clear, and very simple, answer: “Nope.”

“Reform will move forward with determination, clarity, and firm resolve,” he said …

Mer om det katolsk-jødiske samtaledokumentet

Vatikanradioens svenske kontor har en grei oppsummering av dokumentet «THE GIFTS AND THE CALLING OF GOD ARE IRREVOCABLE» (Rom 11:29), som nylig ble utgitt i Vatikanet, og som jeg skrev om her i går. De skriver bl.a.:

15des_katjodisk_samtale

… Dokumentet med titeln «Guds gåvor och kallelser är oåterkallelig», markerar 50-årsdagen av det Andra Vatikankonciliets banbrytande deklaration Nostra Aetate «. Det presenterades vid en presskonferens i Vatikanen av kardinal Kurt Koch och Norbert Hofmann från den judisk-katolska kommissionen, tillsammans med två judiska företrädare …

Dokumentet tar vid där Nostra Aetate slutade, ett halvt sekel senare och gräver djupare in i de taggiga teologiska frågorna som står i centrum för den judisk-katolska dialogen. Det publicerades på engelska, men finns på flera andra språk. Dokumentet som är indelad i sju avsnitt, och börjar med en kort genomgång av de förändrade relationerna mellan katoliker och judar, från att ha varit fiender och främlingar till att vara vänner och bröder» – som påven Franciskus nyligen uttryckte det.

Det upprepar det faktum att kyrkans dialog med judendomen inte kan betraktas i samma ljus som den interreligiösa relationen med andra religioner, och att kristendomen inte kan inte förstås på rätt sätt utanför den judiska kultur i vilken Jesus, hans familj och hans första lärjungar levde.

Dokumentet beskrivs som en studie, snarare än officiell kyrkolära, voch texten har utarbetats mödosamt under flera år med bidrag från både judiska kollegor och Troskongregationen i Vatikanen. I grunden är ligger de olika sätt på vilket judar och kristna förstår det uppenbarade Guds Ord – genom Torahns texter för de första och genom Kristi person för de andra.

Medan kristna har tidigare sett att Kristi liv i det Nya Testamentet är ett substitut eller ersätter det Gamla Testamentets berättelser om Guds utvalda folk, bekräftar detta dokument att Guds ursprungliga förbund med det judiska folket, aldrig kan återkallas. Detta leder till de svåraste frågorna för katoliker om hur judarna kan frälsas om de inte tror på Kristus som Messias och Guds Son. Detta dokument gör inte anspråk på att ha några definitiva svar, men det uppmanar troende att fortsätta att undersöka vad man kallar detta «outgrundliga gudomliga mysterium». …

Leserinnlegg: Vårt Land skriver feil om jøder og Jesus Kristus

Jeg leste et innlegg i Vårt land i går, lørdag 12/12, og skrev i dag følgende leserinnlegg til avisa, som jeg håper å få inn:

Vårt Land skriver feil om jøder og Jesus Kristus

Det pavelige råd for fremme av kristen enhet utga 10/12 et dokument for å markere 50-årsjubileet for Vatikankonsilets erklæring Nostra aetate, om Kirkens forhold til ikke-kristne religioner. Årets dokument handler bare om forholdet til jødene, og der sier man tydelig at det egentlig blir feil å kalle jødedom en annen religion, siden den kristne tro jo utgår fra denne. Man tar også tydelig avstand fra tanken om at Guds pakt med jødene skulle være tilbakelagt eller forkastet.Dette er vel ikke så veldig nytt, men dokumentet går også litt lenger enn mange kristne vil gjøre, ved å si at katolikker ikke bør drive institusjonelt misjonsarbeid blant jøder.

Dokumentet har blitt omtalt i mange aviser og tidsskrifter rundt om i verden, mer eller mindre presist, men én svært grov feil har jeg vel bare sett i VL , som faktisk to ganger skriver: «Jøder trenger ikke tro på Jesus for å bli frelst.» og «(det) slås fast at jøder kan bli frelst uavhengig av Jesus.»

Hvis dette hadde vært sant, hadde det selv sagt vært både overraskende og svært alvorlig, men dokumentet sier faktisk flere ganger det motsatte. Dokumentets 5. avsnitt kalles Det universelle i frelsen i Jesus Kristus og Guds fortsatte pakt med Israel, og der skriver man helt først, i art. 35: «Teorien om at det kan være to forskjellige veier til frelse, en jødisk vei uten Kristus og vei gjennom Kristus, som kristne tror er Jesus fra Nasaret, ville faktisk true grunnlaget for hele den kristne tro. Å bekjenne den universelle og derfor også eksklusive formidlingen av frelsen gjennom Jesus Kristus tilhører kjernen i kristen tro. Det samme gjør bekjennelsen av den ene Gud, Israels Gud, som gjennom sin åpenbaring i Jesus Kristus har blitt fullt ut åpenbart som Gud for alle folkeslag.»

Man ser så på det noe problematiske spørsmålet om hvordan man kan holde sammen sannheten at Jesus er hele verdens frelser med den andre sannheten, at Guds pakt med Israel ikke er opphevet, og man skriver i art. 37:. «Det er Kirkens tro at Kristus er frelser for alle. Det kan ikke være to måter å oppnå frelse, for Kristus er jødenes og hedningene forløser. Her møter vi et mysterium i Guds verk, som ikke egentlig er kristnes misjonærinnsats for å omvende jøder, men heller en forventning om at Herren vil sørge for at alle bli forent, når alle folk vil påkalle Gud med én stemme og tjene ham skulder ved skulder.»

Spørsmålet om hvordan jødene skal bli frelst, og hvordan de skal ledes til Jesus Kristus, er altså noe komplisert, men Den katolske Kirke gjentar også i dette dokumentet at Jesus er den eneste veien til frelse.

Oddvar Moi
katolsk prest, Oslo

Siste messe i Peterskirken

15des10_peterskirken

I dag feiret jeg min siste messe i Peterskirken, siden vi reiser tilbake til Oslo i morgen tidlig. Jeg ble denne gang ledet til et alter jeg aldri har benyttet tidligere; den hellige Basilius’ alter. Bildet er tatt etter messen; jeg står foran alteret med noen venner som deltok – min kone tok bildet.

Om dette alteret kan vi lese:

The subject of the altarpiece is St. Basil Celebrating Mass in the presence of the Arian Emperor Valens. St. Basil is so involved in his devotion at Mass during the Feast of the Epiphany in 372 that he does not notice Emperor Valentius enter with his retinue.

Under alteret ligger den hellige Josafat – 1580-1623. Om ham kan vi lese på katolsk.no (han døde under striden mellom de ortodokse og de som ville forenes med paven i Ukraina):

… en mobb samlet seg utenfor erkebiskopens hus. Folket krevde at Elias skulle løslates og erkebiskopen straffes. Etter tidebønnen vendte Josafat uskadd tilbake til huset og lot Elias gå med en advarsel. Men folkemengden var ikke tilfreds. De brøt seg inn i huset og angrep erkebiskopens tilhengere. Josafat gikk ut til dem og talte til dem i ord som minner om den hellige Thomas Becket: «Mine barn, hva gjør dere med mine tjenere? Hvis dere har noe imot meg, så er jeg her. Man la dem være i fred.» Til folkemengdens rop: «Drep papisten!» ble han slått i hodet med en hellebard og gjennomhullet av en kule. Det lemlestede liket ble dratt ut og kastet i elva Dvina. …

… Ved saligkåringen (i 1643) ble Josafats legeme lagt i en sølvkiste gitt av prins Leo Kasimir Sapieha. I 1706 flyttet prins Karol Radzwill relikviene til sitt slott i Bila Pidlaska, men i 1712 ble relikviene overført til basilianerkirken i Bila Pidlaska. Martyrens relikvier i Polotsk kom i 1916 midt i krigssonen i Første verdenskrig, og de ble i hemmelighet flyttet til Wien. Den 12. november 1923 hedret pave Pius XI (1922-39) Josafat med en egen encyklika med tittelen «Guds Kirke» i forbindelse med 300-jubileet for martyriet. I desember ble hans relikvier utstilt for venerasjon i Stefansdomen i Wien.

Etter krigen ble Wien okkupert av de fire seiersmaktene, og i 1949 ble Josafats relikvier i hemmelighet flyttet fra den sovjetiske sonen til Peterskirken i Roma. Den 25. november 1963 installerte pave Paul VI (1963-78) Josafats relikvier i Peterskirken, under alteret for Basilios. I anledningen 400-årsjubileet for Josafats fødsel ble relikviene den 17. juli 1982 kledd i nye gevanter og en bronsemaske, donert av den kanadiske provinsen av basilianerordenen.

Eukaristiens offerhandling hjelper oss til å ofre oss selv

Lvering_Sacrifice_Community Jeg har lest ferdig Matthew Leverings bok Sacrifice and Community, som han avslutter på denne måten (inkludert et sentralt og interessant sitat fra pave Benedikt):

… As Dostoevsky writes, «And so, man must unceasingly feel suffering [because of man’s sin], which is compensated for by the heavenly joy of fulfilling the law, that is, by sacrifice.»

In exploring Eucharistic theology in this book, I have argued that such radical communion is attained most fully on earth in the Eucharist, which as our sacrificial sharing in Christ’s sacrifice provides a foretaste of the radical communion that is heaven. In the sacrifice-sacrament of the Eucharist, we learn charity by offering with Christ his own saving sacrifice. The sacrament of the Eucharist is a “school” of charity; it builds the Church by enabling us to enact Christ’s sacrifice with him. In the liturgy of the Eucharist, we learn “Jesus Christ and him sacrificed” and thereby we “put on the whole armor of God”. …

… All aspects – theological and liturgical – of the Eucharist should therefore express our Eucharistic sharing in Christ’s cruciform Godwardness, which deifies us. Joseph Ratzinger has described the opposite situation, in which the liturgy of the Eucharist, not understood “ecstatically” as a sacrifice, finds its ground in itself rather than in God:

“The turning of the priest toward the people has turned the community into a self-enclosed circle. In its outward form, it no longer opens out on what lies ahead and above, but is locked into itself. The common turning toward the East was not a «celebration toward the wall»; it did not mean that the priest «had his back to the people»: the priest himself was not regarded as so important. For just as the congregation in the synagogue looked together toward Jerusalem, so in the Christian Liturgy the congregation looked together «toward the Lord». As one of the fathers of Vatican II’s Constitution on the Liturgy, J. A. Jungmann, put it, it was much more a question of priest and people facing in the same direction, knowing that together they were in a procession toward the Lord. They did not close themselves into a circle, they did not gaze at one another, but as the pilgrim People of God they set off for the Oriens, for the Christ who comes to meet us.”

I would add that this “procession toward the Lord” advances only insofar as it is cruciform, that is to say insofar as the communion of the pilgrim People of God arises in and through Christ’s saving sacrifice and our Eucharistic (sacrificial) participation in it. …

Skroll til toppen